AUGUST 9, 2017 | 9:39AM EDT | LONDON
(The following statement was released by the rating agency)
Link to Fitch Ratings' Report: UAE Islamic Banks’ Results Dashboard here
Fitch Ratings says in a new report that UAE Islamic banks' performance in 2016 was hit by higher funding costs and financing impairment charges (FICs).
Stronger financing growth than conventional banks continued. While the average Islamic bank's impaired financing ratio improved further to 5% in 2016, aided by rapid financing growth (above conventional banks), this ratio is skewed by the two largest UAE Islamic banks, which account for almost two-thirds of Islamic banking assets, and whose ratios have fallen sharply to around 4%. The other four Islamic banks have young, fast-growing franchises, and their impaired financing ratios are between 5% and 9%. FICs increased to 1.4% of financing in 2016 (2015: 1.1%) due to deterioration in the SME segment.
Islamic financing grew, albeit at a slower rate of 10% (2015: 19%), due to wider adoption and more innovative structuring of sharia-compliant products. Higher funding costs in 2016 put pressure on most Islamic banks' net financing margins and operating profitability metrics, despite many banks successfully repricing their financing books. The main reasons for the increase are UAE banks' high reliance on profit-bearing time deposits and lower liquidity in the system due to lower oil prices.
The Islamic banks' average cost/income ratio was almost stable due to tight cost control. Higher FICs also affected profitability, consuming 38% of pre-impairment operating profit (2015: 33%). Tighter liquidity from 1H15 continued into 2016.
The average financing/deposits ratio rose to nearly 95%, and is now much closer to that of the conventional banks. Islamic banks tend to have higher levels of deposit funding than conventional banks, as their retail focus gives them a larger influx of retail customer deposits, although this has reduced with further sukuk issuance in 2016.
UAE Islamic banks improved their capital ratios in 2016 despite financing growth, mainly through issuing additional Tier 1 capital and improving internal capital generation. Nevertheless, their average Fitch core capital ratio of 13% is below conventional banks' 15%, due to higher financing growth since 2012, and this ratio is low in light of high concentration risk (by single borrower and by sector).
Nevertheless, the FCC ratio varied significantly across Islamic banks, from 9% to 20%, at end-2016. The UAE central bank's centralised sharia board was further formalised in 2017.
In light of the Dana Gas declaring its sukuk non-sharia compliant, the mandate of a centralised sharia board and the extent of its involvement in sukuk standardisation are more important than ever. However, there is still limited clarity on the board's mandate and influence. Fitch-rated UAE banks have no exposure to this sukuk.
Fitch expects financing growth to slow to high-single digits in 2017 (still higher than conventional banks) and the recently granted financing portfolios to start seasoning, with a consequent mild deterioration in the Islamic banks' impaired financing ratios. Profitability metrics are expected to improve with lower FICs, but not return to previous levels due to persistently higher, albeit improved, funding costs.
More information is available in "UAE Islamic Banks - Results Dashboard", available at www.fitchratings.com or by clicking the link above.
Contact: Redmond Ramsdale Head of GCC Bank Ratings +44 20 3530 1836 Fitch Ratings Limited 30 North Colonnade London E14 5GN Bashar Al Natoor Global Head of Islamic Finance +971 4 424 1242 Media Relations: Rose Connolly, London, Tel: +44 203 530 1741, Email: email@example.com. Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com
Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved.
In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors.
Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned.
Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security.
Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent).
The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction.
Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only.
Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001.