Muslim-led arts initiatives tackling Islamophobia, promoting interfaith harmony among UK children30 Sep 2018
Are runway shows at fashion weeks helping Indonesia’s modest wear SMEs?21 Sep 2018
Tempers soar in Malaysia after senators call for more conservative airline dress code08 Mar 2018
2017 a game-changing year for modest fashion12 Dec 2017
New modest fashion brand Faspiration dreams big, aims to go global31 Jul 2017
INTERVIEW: Why free zones are important and how to develop them for halal trade: Koen De Praetere03 Jul 2017
Remembering Gertrude Bell, the ‘woman who made Iraq’01 Jul 2017
INTERVIEW: Halal hubs in Malaysia and the potential of establishing free zones for modest fashion: Dr Mohamed Amin Mohd Kassim28 Jun 2017
Mubarakdeals.com sees opportunity in online-to-offline modest fashion business model in India07 Jun 2017
Weekend reading: Mosque design revisited in the face of Islamophobia, need for greater inclusion02 Jun 2017
OPINION: Firms should respect right to wear hijab
The rule barring Muslim women wearing hijab from working at the front line of certain hotels has sparked a debate. Pix by Asyraf Hamzah / File photo / New Straits Times
NOVEMBER 30, 2017 | 10:30AM MYT
IT is the duty of every person to respect another’s dignity and esteem. Dressing appropriately and safeguarding chastity are important for Muslims. The criterion of modest dressing for women in the presence of strangers and relatives who are not “mahram” is contained in the Quran.
In some Muslim countries, such as Saudi Arabia and Iran, it is compulsory for women to wear the hijab at the workplace, while in Eygpt, Jordan, Syria, Algeria and Bosnia, it is optional.
However, in some Muslim countries, the majority of women prefer to wear the hijab, like in Yemen and the United Arab Emirates.
Similarly, in Malaysia, it is optional for Muslim women to wear the hijab at the workplace. However, in Islamic organisations and institutions of higher learning, it is compulsory for female staff and students to wear it.
Discrimination based on religious beliefs in the workplace, including the prohibition of wearing religious clothing, such as the hijab among female Muslim employees, has been addressed by the United States’ Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
In Europe, the European Court of Justice has ruled that the barring of Muslim women from wearing Islamic headscarf at work does not constitute direct discrimination.
In Malaysia, the rule barring Muslim women wearing hijab from working at the front line of certain hotels has sparked a debate. Some have contended that discrimination on the basis of religious dressing is against the Federal Constitution’s Article 3.
It must be emphasised that a veil covering the full face, or niqab, is not allowed among female employees at the workplace, based on the decision of the Supreme Court in Hjh Halimatussaadiah Bte Hj Kamaruddin v Public Services Commission, Malaysia & Anor .
In this case, the court held inter alia that the prohibition against the wearing of attire covering the face by female civil officers at the workplace does not violate the appellant’s constitutional right to profess and practise her Muslim religion.
In this case, the appellant, a clerk in the Perak state legal adviser’s office, was dismissed after she persisted in wearing the niqab at the workplace in contravention of a government circular that prohibited female civil servants from wearing attire covering the face during office hours. The prohibition is only in relation to niqab and does not extend to hijab, and thus, no employer should indiscriminately bar female Muslim employee from wearing hijab at the workplace.
The Industrial Court has ruled that employees must be protected from victimisation, harassment and discrimination.
The gender discrimination claims can be based on Section 20(1) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967.
Dismissal tainted with unfair motives, having the element of discrimination, victimisation, capricious or mala fide actions that are incorporated under unfair labour practices would come within the scope of Section 20(1).
The claim for constructive dismissal and unlawful gender discrimination is intertwined.
The requirement of bona fide is essential in the dismissal. If the dismissal or termination is as a result of discrimination, the Industrial Court can interfere and to set aside such dismissal. The company must therefore be committed to a discrimination-free work environment.
PROFESSOR DR ASHGAR ALI ALI MOHAMED, Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws, International Islamic University Malaysia.
Copyright New Straits Times
World Green Economy Summit 2018
- Dubai International Convention and Exhibition Centre, Sheikh Zayed Road, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
UAE Abaya's Championship 2018
- Dubai, UAE
State of the Global Islamic Economy Report Launch Seminar
- DIFC Conference Centre, Exchange Building, Dubai
- Algeria bans wearing of full-face veils at work
19 Oct 2018|regulations-compliance
- Dubai Culture Announces Islamic Creative Economy Competition in Partnership with DIEDC
15 Oct 2018|production
- Saudi Fashion Week postponed until further notice, organizers announce
15 Oct 2018|marketing-sales
- Pottery from early Islamic era found in Riyadh
11 Oct 2018|production
Join the Community
Post discussions, discuss trending topics and network with other Islamic economy professionals.Register Now
Comprehensive Islamic finance and Islamic Economy reports by Thomson Reuters Islamic Finance Gateway.View All Publications
Publish Your Press Releases
Share your company's latest updates.Submit Your Press Releases